Signal Modulation Recognition System Based on Different Signal Noise Rate Using Artificial Intelligent Approach

Main Article Content

Rasool F. Jader
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4563-4050
Mudhafar Haji M. Abd
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6858-1268
Ihsan Hamza Jumaa
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1453-7020

Abstract

Everyone has paid much attention to modulation-type recognition in the past few years. There are many ways to find the modulation type, but only a few good ways to deal with signals with a lot of noise. This study comes up with a way to test how well different machine learning algorithms can handle noise when detecting digital and analogue modulations. This study looks at the four most common digital and analogue modulations: Phase Shift Keying, Quadrature Phase Shift Keying, Amplitude Modulation, and Morse Code. A signal noise rate from -10dB to +25dB is used to find these modulations. We used machine learning algorithms to determine the modulation type like Decision Tree, Random Forest, Support Vectors Machine, and k-nearest neighbours. After the IQ samples had been converted to the amplitude of samples and radio frequency format, the accuracy of each method looked good. Still, in the format of the sample phase, each algorithm's accuracy was less. The results show that the proposed method works to find the signals that have noises. When there is less noise, the random forest algorithm gives better results than SVM, but SVM gives better results when there is more noise.

Article Details

How to Cite
Jader, R. F., Abd, M. H. M. ., & Jumaa, I. H. (2022). Signal Modulation Recognition System Based on Different Signal Noise Rate Using Artificial Intelligent Approach . Journal of Studies in Science and Engineering, 2(4), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.53898/josse2022244
Section
Research Articles

References

O. S. Mossad, M. ElNainay, and M. Torki, "Modulations Recognition using Deep Neural Network in Wireless Communications," presented at the 2nd Europe – Middle East – North African Regional ITS Conference, Aswan 2019, 2019.

R. Jader and S. Aminifar, "Predictive Model for Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes in the Kurdistan Region by a Combination of Clustering and Classification Algorithms: An Ensemble Approach," Applied Computational Intelligence and Soft Computing, vol. 2022, 2022.

J. Wu, M. Khishe, M. Mohammadi, S. H. T. Karim, and M. Shams, "Acoustic detection and recognition of dolphins using swarm intelligence neural networks," Applied Ocean Research, vol. 115, p. 102837, 2021.

R. F. Jader, S. Aminifar, and M. H. M. Abd, "Diabetes detection system by mixing supervised and unsupervised algorithms," Journal of Studies in Science and Engineering, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 52-65, 2022.

R. Jader and S. Aminifar, "Fast and Accurate Artificial Neural Network Model for Diabetes Recogni-tion," NeuroQuantology, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 2187-2196, 2022.

K. H. Rawf, A. Abdulrahman, and A. Mohammed, "Effective Kurdish Sign Language Detection and Classification Using Convolutional Neural Networks," 2022.

Y.-q. Hu, J. Liu, and X.-h. Tan, "Digital modulation recognition based on instantaneous information," The Journal of China Universities of Posts and Telecommunications, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 52-90, 2010/06/01/ 2010.

W. Xiong, P. Bogdanov, and M. Zheleva, "Robust and efficient modulation recognition based on local sequential iq features," in IEEE INFOCOM 2019-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, 2019: IEEE, pp. 1612-1620.

M. H. Mala Abd and S. Aminifar, "Intelligent Digital Signal Modulation Recognition using Machine Learning," Journal of Computer Science, vol. 18, no. 10, 2022.

K. Sethi, A. Gupta, G. Gupta, and V. Jaiswal, "Comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms on different datasets," in Circulation in Computer Science International Conference on Innovations in Computing (ICIC 2017), 2019, vol. 87.

M. H. M. Abd and S. Aminifar, "A Demodulator Selection Model for Received FSK and ASK Signals," Neuro Quantology, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 2181-2186, 2022.

H. Mustafa and M. Doroslovacki, "Digital modulation recognition using support vector machine classifier," in Conference Record of the Thirty-Eighth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, 2004., 2004, vol. 2: IEEE, pp. 2238-2242.

M. A. Hazar, N. Odabaşioğlu, T. Ensari, and Y. Kavurucu, "Evaluation of machine learning algorithms for automatic modulation recognition," in International Conference on Neural Information Processing, 2015: Springer, pp. 208-215.

S. Hassanpour, A. M. Pezeshk, and F. Behnia, "Automatic digital modulation recognition based on novel features and support vector machine," in 2016 12th International Conference on Signal-Image Technology & Internet-Based Systems (SITIS), 2016: IEEE, pp. 172-177.

D. Sun, Y. Chen, J. Liu, Y. Li, and R. Ma, "Digital signal modulation recognition algorithm based on vggnet model," in 2019 IEEE 5th international conference on computer and communications (ICCC), 2019: IEEE, pp. 1575-1579.

Y. Sun, J. Li, F. Lin, and G. Pan, "Automatic signal modulation recognition based on deep convolutional neural network," in 3rd International Conference on Computer Engineering, Information Science & Application Technology (ICCIA 2019), 2019: Atlantis Press, pp. 550-554.

S. Ansari, K. A. Alnajjar, S. Abdallah, and M. Saad, "Automatic digital modulation recognition based on machine learning algorithms," in 2020 International Conference on Communications, Computing, Cybersecurity, and Informatics (CCCI), 2020: IEEE, pp. 1-6.